ØE US Elections unit
Many of the students at Østerskov were interested in the United States election. They read the newspapers in the morning and see what the media has published about the debates and the final statements from the candidates. There were short biographies of the two major candidates the weekend before the election, and the day of the election, the local newspaper predicted that Obama’s next house would be the White House.
We started the week with an explanation of the primary and caucus system and then held a mock Democrat caucus in the courtyard. Fifteen students were selected to be “Convincers” and everyone else had three random viewpoints their character held. To win someone over to a convincer’s point of view, the Convincer had to talk with the person and determine his or her point of view. If they got at least two of the viewpoints, they were considered convinced and received a ribbon to pull someone with a ribbon over to another side, a new convincer would have to get all three viewpoints. At the end of the timeframe, convincers and people with ribbons moved to different parts of the room and we discussed what happened when there were less than 15% in a group (the group was disbanded and they had to join another group). The largest group was considered the caucus’ nominee. It was a short version, and many students just wandered around visiting or hiding from the convincers, but many other fully threw themselves into the process and took vocal stands on their character’s issues.

On Tuesday, students were put into pairs: two for each party for each of 20 states. An effort was made to make sure that student assignments in pairs where there was a balance of academic and English-speaking skills. None of the students complained or negotiated out of their pairings. Helped by another teacher (for some Danish translations), I taught a lesson explaining the electoral college as an English language lesson, and other teachers gave lessons for calculating the allotment of US representatives and analyzing poll statistics as math lessons. The students paid attention and were able to give answers in complete sentences in English demonstrating comprehension of the material. Each pair brought their answers up to the front and I corrected both parties’ work to determine which party had the most complete answers: that party won the round, giving their state and party a popular vote.
This continued with more lessons and activities on Wednesday concerning campaign issues such as the economy (current events), the environment (science) and abortion (this applied as religious studies; abortion is easily obtained in Denmark).
I videotaped instant debates on the environment where students were presented with a reading about the business/economy vs preservation/protection conflict and then were given a topic to debate: the democrats received the ultra-liberal viewpoint and the republicans received the ultra-conservative viewpoint. Students had 10-15 minutes to research their side, gather statistics and arguments before their three-minute, three-round debate. They were very effective in the debate, pulling the teacher “pendulum” over to their side with their arguments and facts. The winning team was effective if the teacher ended up on their side after stepping to each side in response to facts and plausible claims.

Mornings started with a short lesson or news information, and on Wednesday I announced the winner of the US election: Barack Obama. Most of the students were very happy to hear this. We listened to parts of speeches made by John McCain and Barack Obama and heard about the popular vote and the electoral vote for the election. On Thursday we announced the winners of the debate, and calculated the total electoral college points that each team had won, and found that the Democrat party had also won the school competition-election. We spent the afternoon playing “American” sports: basketball, American football, and my favorite, baseball, which I taught. Most of the students had never played baseball before.
We ended the week with final lessons on the history behind the US elections and its laws: The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It was a whirlwind lesson, and a very challenging one due to the old language in both the English and Danish translations of the documents, but they worked hard and were each assigned to make their own Bill of Rights. As always, some students take the assignment more seriously than others, but with the added expectation and instruction for the students to save this document into their network portfolio, most of them stepped up to completing the assignment.
I’ve noticed that in small groups, pairs especially, students work hard to get the assignments done, and there is a very high rate of completion in these assignments—especially when there is an element of competition. In the larger groups, there are often students who sit on the edge of the group and don’t participate in the activity. Just like at home! What I don’t see is students complaining about or negotiating out of their assigned groupings or pairings.
This was our final unit at Østerskov Efterskole. Saying goodbye was difficult, as we had spent three fascinating and fun weeks living with the students here and getting to know them. There were a lot of hugs, “hug sandwiches” and group hugs as we said goodbye to our new friends here.
(note the “I Voted” stickers on the noses and hat)
Posted in Journey entries | No Comments »















